Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Evolution
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eagle Eye" data-source="post: 2699736" data-attributes="member: 34489"><p>^^^^ this is perhaps the most frightening part of the "information age". Anybody can make a webpage and present all sorts of ideas and hypotheses, and with strong words and effective writing skills can make a case against hot topic issues such as global warming, evolution, plate tectonics etc. Many people come across this stuff but don't realize that there is no scientific evidence supporting those hypotheses or statements. But, it will sound convincing, and people will buy into it. </p><p> </p><p>The worst is when scientists use actual scientific discoveries to make conclusions about the super natural world. one example, this <a href="https://chab123.wordpress.com/2013/12/27/scientific-evidence-for-god-dr-michael-strauss/" target="_blank">guy.</a></p><p></p><p>Just to be clear... this man knows science, and he is a professor! However, is argument is PURE conjecture. There is NO (i.e., zero) evidence of god in his presentation.</p><p></p><p>Someone said the following, either in this thread or in another about the bible. </p><p>Just because [a] is true in the bible does not mean that <strong> is also true. </strong></p><p><strong>Same goes for this man's logic. Just because physics works this way, doesn't mean it was created by God. </strong></p><p> <strong>Also, he ignores many other theories that directly contradict his perception</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eagle Eye, post: 2699736, member: 34489"] ^^^^ this is perhaps the most frightening part of the "information age". Anybody can make a webpage and present all sorts of ideas and hypotheses, and with strong words and effective writing skills can make a case against hot topic issues such as global warming, evolution, plate tectonics etc. Many people come across this stuff but don't realize that there is no scientific evidence supporting those hypotheses or statements. But, it will sound convincing, and people will buy into it. The worst is when scientists use actual scientific discoveries to make conclusions about the super natural world. one example, this [URL="https://chab123.wordpress.com/2013/12/27/scientific-evidence-for-god-dr-michael-strauss/"]guy.[/URL] Just to be clear... this man knows science, and he is a professor! However, is argument is PURE conjecture. There is NO (i.e., zero) evidence of god in his presentation. Someone said the following, either in this thread or in another about the bible. Just because [a] is true in the bible does not mean that [b] is also true. Same goes for this man's logic. Just because physics works this way, doesn't mean it was created by God. Also, he ignores many other theories that directly contradict his perception[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Evolution
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom