Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Florida school shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 3083382" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>I emphatically support the protections of the Fourth Amendment, but the Fourth isn't implicated when people *voluntarily* share what they've seen, and it *certainly* isn't implicated in reading what they publicly post to the world. If my garbage isn't private--and SCOTUS has ruled that it isn't--why in the world would I expect that something I post to the internet equivalent of a billboard to be private?</p><p></p><p>When somebody does something that would make a reasonable person raise an eyebrow and say "that boy just ain't quite right," there's nothing wrong with sniffing around the edges a little bit. Invasive searching, involuntary questioning, coercing people to act as spies, absolutely wrong; but if his neighbor says "y'know, ol' Timmy seems to be buying an awful lot of fertilizer, and his yard just isn't that big," that's not a violation of Timmy's rights or his neighbor's; that's just good police work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 3083382, member: 13624"] I emphatically support the protections of the Fourth Amendment, but the Fourth isn't implicated when people *voluntarily* share what they've seen, and it *certainly* isn't implicated in reading what they publicly post to the world. If my garbage isn't private--and SCOTUS has ruled that it isn't--why in the world would I expect that something I post to the internet equivalent of a billboard to be private? When somebody does something that would make a reasonable person raise an eyebrow and say "that boy just ain't quite right," there's nothing wrong with sniffing around the edges a little bit. Invasive searching, involuntary questioning, coercing people to act as spies, absolutely wrong; but if his neighbor says "y'know, ol' Timmy seems to be buying an awful lot of fertilizer, and his yard just isn't that big," that's not a violation of Timmy's rights or his neighbor's; that's just good police work. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Florida school shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom