Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Glock hater thinking of buying a Glock
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mad Professor" data-source="post: 3208316" data-attributes="member: 5316"><p>Now more on the order of release and/or development, but the first was based on Gaston Glock’s 17th patent. </p><p></p><p>Several are not imported the 25, 28, 46 etc. </p><p></p><p>A couple of times a new caliber was introduced and it came out in a 17, 19, 26 sized frame so there were sequential order. When the .40s came out the and thing but they were 17, 19, and 17L based. Then the 26 and 27 were the next US group released.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mad Professor, post: 3208316, member: 5316"] Now more on the order of release and/or development, but the first was based on Gaston Glock’s 17th patent. Several are not imported the 25, 28, 46 etc. A couple of times a new caliber was introduced and it came out in a 17, 19, 26 sized frame so there were sequential order. When the .40s came out the and thing but they were 17, 19, and 17L based. Then the 26 and 27 were the next US group released. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Glock hater thinking of buying a Glock
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom