Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Has any otherwise lawful Oklahoman ever been convicted of open carry since the SDA?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TallPrairie" data-source="post: 1754654" data-attributes="member: 7815"><p>I just thought of one more way to put it. It's as if 1272 says "open carry for self-defense is banned unless 1289.6 says it is allowed" and 1289.6 says "open carry for self-defense is allowed unless that is contrary to 1272." At the end of the day, has either statute actually authorized open carry? It doesn't look like it. They are each waiting on a "mother may I" from the other provision that never comes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TallPrairie, post: 1754654, member: 7815"] I just thought of one more way to put it. It's as if 1272 says "open carry for self-defense is banned unless 1289.6 says it is allowed" and 1289.6 says "open carry for self-defense is allowed unless that is contrary to 1272." At the end of the day, has either statute actually authorized open carry? It doesn't look like it. They are each waiting on a "mother may I" from the other provision that never comes. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Has any otherwise lawful Oklahoman ever been convicted of open carry since the SDA?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom