Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
HB2522: Open Carry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1771402" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>When reaching compromises, you must be very careful with how far you compromise. In this case, to "take what we can get" would be to accept a separate permitting process for open carry versus concealed carry where your instructor gets to determine if you can carry openly in addition to being able to carry concealed, or if you can only carry concealed because he happens to agree with the Oklahoma Rifle Association's opposition to open carry (whether independently or because of a gainful relationship).</p><p></p><p>I would consider simply adding the language "or unconcealed" after every instance of "concealed" in the SDA and any other relevant statutes to be an acceptable open carry compromise for the time being. But requiring a separate subjective permitting process is completely unacceptable to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1771402, member: 5151"] When reaching compromises, you must be very careful with how far you compromise. In this case, to "take what we can get" would be to accept a separate permitting process for open carry versus concealed carry where your instructor gets to determine if you can carry openly in addition to being able to carry concealed, or if you can only carry concealed because he happens to agree with the Oklahoma Rifle Association's opposition to open carry (whether independently or because of a gainful relationship). I would consider simply adding the language "or unconcealed" after every instance of "concealed" in the SDA and any other relevant statutes to be an acceptable open carry compromise for the time being. But requiring a separate subjective permitting process is completely unacceptable to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
HB2522: Open Carry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom