Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Hunting with an AR
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 902388" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>Thanks for proving my point - I'm tired of trying to provide actual facts to what was essentially a side-track in a half-way decent post about hunting with an AR where some douche-bag popped off with </p><p></p><p></p><p>None of what you said in the above quote makes any rebuttal to any of the facts I've pointed out to you - so again, you're clearly not reading my posts either, but rather flinging poo at the screen and trying to type random words around the crap smeared all over your monitor.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This makes no sense at all. A longer barrel achieves higher velocity true, but for some strange reason, tons of 175lb insurgents are easily taken with 55-75gr FMJ 5.56 rounds out of a fairly short barrel. </p><p></p><p>I suppose you'll pop off with some vast amount of military expertise on why the 5.56 round is inadequate for our troops in your defense, but honestly, I don't care since you've proven nothing other than that you can put random words in a post that didn't really ask for your opinion on the matter in the first place.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is pure genius here. First off, I never said that I need 30rd mags. Second of all - I can't fire the round at any "marginal velocity" simply by using a 16" or 14.5" barrel.</p><p></p><p>Why not back up what you say with facts other than pure crap as flung from your armchair?</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.accuratereloading.com/223sb.html" target="_blank">http://www.accuratereloading.com/223sb.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm sure you don't. As a matter of fact, let me check with the person who brought up the .22lr argument in this thread. Oh, its the same poop-chucking monkey that pumped out the steaming pile of knowledge above.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This one makes less sense than most of the other cryptic Lincoln-logs you've left us with. I think just quoting it makes you look bad enough that I don't need to reply.</p><p></p><p>Oh wait, here's a good rebuttal:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How about this as an answer to the genius question made in an attempt at derailing a half-way decent thread:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How about because the guy who gave us these nuggets above thinks its a bad idea - and generally, going in the opposite direction of this kind of verbal diarrhea is always a good idea.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 902388, member: 229"] Thanks for proving my point - I'm tired of trying to provide actual facts to what was essentially a side-track in a half-way decent post about hunting with an AR where some douche-bag popped off with None of what you said in the above quote makes any rebuttal to any of the facts I've pointed out to you - so again, you're clearly not reading my posts either, but rather flinging poo at the screen and trying to type random words around the crap smeared all over your monitor. This makes no sense at all. A longer barrel achieves higher velocity true, but for some strange reason, tons of 175lb insurgents are easily taken with 55-75gr FMJ 5.56 rounds out of a fairly short barrel. I suppose you'll pop off with some vast amount of military expertise on why the 5.56 round is inadequate for our troops in your defense, but honestly, I don't care since you've proven nothing other than that you can put random words in a post that didn't really ask for your opinion on the matter in the first place. This is pure genius here. First off, I never said that I need 30rd mags. Second of all - I can't fire the round at any "marginal velocity" simply by using a 16" or 14.5" barrel. Why not back up what you say with facts other than pure crap as flung from your armchair? [url]http://www.accuratereloading.com/223sb.html[/url] I'm sure you don't. As a matter of fact, let me check with the person who brought up the .22lr argument in this thread. Oh, its the same poop-chucking monkey that pumped out the steaming pile of knowledge above. This one makes less sense than most of the other cryptic Lincoln-logs you've left us with. I think just quoting it makes you look bad enough that I don't need to reply. Oh wait, here's a good rebuttal: How about this as an answer to the genius question made in an attempt at derailing a half-way decent thread: How about because the guy who gave us these nuggets above thinks its a bad idea - and generally, going in the opposite direction of this kind of verbal diarrhea is always a good idea. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Hunting with an AR
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom