Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Hunting with an AR
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 902631" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>Thanks again for proving my point.</p><p></p><p>Some how, this:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>means that I need 30rd mags? That's exactly what I said isn't it? How about the fact that I'm saying that I shouldn't be limited from using whatever the hell I want (with respect to legal firearms) for any legal sporting purpose?</p><p></p><p>I love the "Why do you need that" argument - this feels strangely like I'm having an argument with an anti-gun person. You've clearly got some issues with what you consider "assault weapons" and you chose to try and derail this thread by injecting your ideals into it and no one has bought anything that you have to say.</p><p></p><p>Check this out:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You want name-calling, how about this one - you're posts in this thread have all been extremely anti-"Assault weapon" and that quite frankly, is anti-gun.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No - I claim you aren't reading my posts - but now that I look back, clearly you're reading them with the "anti-assault-weapon" blinders on.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You haven't been around long enough to see me do much of anything - you've been here a year - and I'm less than impressed with the fact that you're somehow stalking me through my posts.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is what people do when their invalid argument is called to the carpet - they start making up new rules to help them prove their point (even if there was no point in the first place).</p><p></p><p>This is the same thing as little Jimmy saying "nuh-uh, the bumper on that car is base, you can't tag me".</p><p></p><p>No one brought up "equivalent" gun - that's a crap argument since ARs aren't at all like bolt-action guns. Why does an AR have to be equivalent to what you define as a "hunting rifle" for it to be used in an argument - weren't you the one who brought up this little gem:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 902631, member: 229"] Thanks again for proving my point. Some how, this: means that I need 30rd mags? That's exactly what I said isn't it? How about the fact that I'm saying that I shouldn't be limited from using whatever the hell I want (with respect to legal firearms) for any legal sporting purpose? I love the "Why do you need that" argument - this feels strangely like I'm having an argument with an anti-gun person. You've clearly got some issues with what you consider "assault weapons" and you chose to try and derail this thread by injecting your ideals into it and no one has bought anything that you have to say. Check this out: You want name-calling, how about this one - you're posts in this thread have all been extremely anti-"Assault weapon" and that quite frankly, is anti-gun. No - I claim you aren't reading my posts - but now that I look back, clearly you're reading them with the "anti-assault-weapon" blinders on. You haven't been around long enough to see me do much of anything - you've been here a year - and I'm less than impressed with the fact that you're somehow stalking me through my posts. This is what people do when their invalid argument is called to the carpet - they start making up new rules to help them prove their point (even if there was no point in the first place). This is the same thing as little Jimmy saying "nuh-uh, the bumper on that car is base, you can't tag me". No one brought up "equivalent" gun - that's a crap argument since ARs aren't at all like bolt-action guns. Why does an AR have to be equivalent to what you define as a "hunting rifle" for it to be used in an argument - weren't you the one who brought up this little gem: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Hunting with an AR
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom