Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hypothetical conflict
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheRulingFool" data-source="post: 710204" data-attributes="member: 4369"><p>The oath of office of the President is as follows:</p><p></p><p>I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.</p><p></p><p>Why, then, has no one questioned the President or lawmakers when they enact and enforce legislation that flies in the face of our Constitutional rights? Would it be a stretch to say that Presidents have been violating or failing to uphold the oath of the office that they hold? And if that's the case, would they be culpable for violating the highest law of the land? What sort of penalty should that carry?</p><p></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/image103.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":soapbox:" title="Image103 :soapbox:" data-shortname=":soapbox:" /> <img src="/images/smilies/image103.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":soapbox:" title="Image103 :soapbox:" data-shortname=":soapbox:" /> <img src="/images/smilies/image103.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":soapbox:" title="Image103 :soapbox:" data-shortname=":soapbox:" /></p><p>I firmly believe that everyone involved in government that has some issue with our Constitutional rights (Second Amendment, anyone?) should take their wonderful selves to a country that agrees with them, and enjoy themselves... and in so doing, keep off our lawn. I am sick of seeing lawyers and judges and those in government acting like things that should be VERY clear are really that complicated. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Is that REALLY that hard to understand? There are many examples of the founding fathers' intent on the matter. It's not that damn complicated.</p><p><img src="/images/smilies/image103.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":soapbox:" title="Image103 :soapbox:" data-shortname=":soapbox:" /> <img src="/images/smilies/image103.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":soapbox:" title="Image103 :soapbox:" data-shortname=":soapbox:" /> <img src="/images/smilies/image103.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":soapbox:" title="Image103 :soapbox:" data-shortname=":soapbox:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheRulingFool, post: 710204, member: 4369"] The oath of office of the President is as follows: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Why, then, has no one questioned the President or lawmakers when they enact and enforce legislation that flies in the face of our Constitutional rights? Would it be a stretch to say that Presidents have been violating or failing to uphold the oath of the office that they hold? And if that's the case, would they be culpable for violating the highest law of the land? What sort of penalty should that carry? :soapbox: :soapbox: :soapbox: I firmly believe that everyone involved in government that has some issue with our Constitutional rights (Second Amendment, anyone?) should take their wonderful selves to a country that agrees with them, and enjoy themselves... and in so doing, keep off our lawn. I am sick of seeing lawyers and judges and those in government acting like things that should be VERY clear are really that complicated. "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Is that REALLY that hard to understand? There are many examples of the founding fathers' intent on the matter. It's not that damn complicated. :soapbox: :soapbox: :soapbox: [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Hypothetical conflict
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom