Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
If a (hypothetical) amendment were passed to ban guns
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 4023752" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>You’re giving me far too much credit on this one, sir.</p><p></p><p>I've stated many times that i don't think it will happen. I asked a question about what people might do about 'gun control' that would fall within an approach that is Constitutionally sound. </p><p></p><p>Anything that you infer beyond that is on you. </p><p></p><p>I also said at one point that the overarching question could easily be applied to many of the different rights that we currently find to be fundamental. It's not a question that is limited to guns, but rather was meant to explore the idea of people using the provided framework to make big changes to our system.</p><p></p><p>I made no argument in favor of the efforts or against the efforts. I simply asked what people would do. Their own passions could lead them in many directions. Which was kind of the point. I neither suggest nor advocated for anyway with my question, though. I stated a scenario without implication of whether it was good or bad.</p><p></p><p>If you want to spin the hypothetical out to all possible pitfalls, you certainly can, but it goes beyond the scope of what i asked.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 4023752, member: 277"] You’re giving me far too much credit on this one, sir. I've stated many times that i don't think it will happen. I asked a question about what people might do about 'gun control' that would fall within an approach that is Constitutionally sound. Anything that you infer beyond that is on you. I also said at one point that the overarching question could easily be applied to many of the different rights that we currently find to be fundamental. It's not a question that is limited to guns, but rather was meant to explore the idea of people using the provided framework to make big changes to our system. I made no argument in favor of the efforts or against the efforts. I simply asked what people would do. Their own passions could lead them in many directions. Which was kind of the point. I neither suggest nor advocated for anyway with my question, though. I stated a scenario without implication of whether it was good or bad. If you want to spin the hypothetical out to all possible pitfalls, you certainly can, but it goes beyond the scope of what i asked. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
If a (hypothetical) amendment were passed to ban guns
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom