Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 4025857" data-attributes="member: 277">I agree to a point. I do think it'd be a big deal. But for the sake of an online poll, i tried to keep it basic and see if the question could foster discussion. I agree it wasn't a fluke that they were no. 1 and no 2., however nothing i've found said that being the top slots would otherwise protect those amendments from later change. It would have (seemingly) been an easy thing to single out, had the founds wanted to. Our history if full of moments where belief and faith in the system dictated what did and did not happen. The system needs people to buy into its legitimacy to work, which is one thing people here often point to whenever they feel someone is infringing on their 2nd amendment rights. Illegal measures towards gun control undercut the foundation of the Constitution. So would ignoring a Constitutional change do the same thing? I honestly don't know and was curious how people here would view such an effort.</blockquote>