Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Robert871" data-source="post: 1059051" data-attributes="member: 10963">i feel like the thread has gone away from the topic, i never said that price was a concern, simply function and as it turns out the variable powers took care of that. another concern was size, but considdering it was a training rifle for the era of the m1grand size didnt factor either. everyone has their own opinon on preferance, that however does not mean that i feel it acceptable to demine what others prefer. i kind of had to laugh when somone mentioend or rather at least hinted that i was planning and did, put a 300 scope on an "inexpensive gun" that "the scope far exceeded the value of the gun" or something to that measure. form what i have seen on gunbroker, the same gun in the same condition has been up for between 500-800 dollars. i am not bragging, but it makes sense, i found sites that talked about the desgn and manufacturing of the barrel and saying it was a technique that is used today in tournament rifles of its caliber. do not be mistaken, despite my skill and marksmanship and knowledge of equpment, i take pride in my newly inherited gun. i had planned on just rolling my eyes at the out of control rants but it seems this thread keeps poping back up to the top day after day. to those of you that gave an honest opinion on your preferance and experiences with your target 22s with big scopes, thanks. for the typical forum trolling rant ready others, <img src="/images/smilies/screwy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":screwy:" title="Screwy    :screwy:" data-shortname=":screwy:" /></blockquote>

Verification