Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lautenberg / Carolyn McCarthy to reintroduce gun-ban bill
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alank2" data-source="post: 1431269" data-attributes="member: 108"><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>+1 to all of this post; well thought out.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately CCW's have no protection in case things go badly, and in a situation like this, things are apt to go badly. So, as much as I would like to hear in the news that he was put down by a good guy with a CCW, and I would, there could be an equal chance that the CCW person shoots 3 people by mistake trying to get the bad guy, which would also be a great tragedy.</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong, if you have the training, the confidence, are in the right place at the right time with a clear shot and no bystanders, and no family of your own to bring into the bad guys sights, and you can stop someone like this, by all means. There are a lot of "if's" here.</p><p></p><p>I agree that this sort of thing is going to happen in a free society and that those who would change laws and limit freedom to attempt to stop these sorts of events are fooling themselves (or others so they can't get their agenda).</p><p></p><p>One real question - WHY was there no security at this event? With the billions and trillions the fed spends, they can't afford a couple of secret service agents?</p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p></p><p>Alan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alank2, post: 1431269, member: 108"] Hi, +1 to all of this post; well thought out. Unfortunately CCW's have no protection in case things go badly, and in a situation like this, things are apt to go badly. So, as much as I would like to hear in the news that he was put down by a good guy with a CCW, and I would, there could be an equal chance that the CCW person shoots 3 people by mistake trying to get the bad guy, which would also be a great tragedy. Don't get me wrong, if you have the training, the confidence, are in the right place at the right time with a clear shot and no bystanders, and no family of your own to bring into the bad guys sights, and you can stop someone like this, by all means. There are a lot of "if's" here. I agree that this sort of thing is going to happen in a free society and that those who would change laws and limit freedom to attempt to stop these sorts of events are fooling themselves (or others so they can't get their agenda). One real question - WHY was there no security at this event? With the billions and trillions the fed spends, they can't afford a couple of secret service agents? Thanks, Alan [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lautenberg / Carolyn McCarthy to reintroduce gun-ban bill
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom