Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lautenberg / Carolyn McCarthy to reintroduce gun-ban bill
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dale00" data-source="post: 1443528" data-attributes="member: 688"><p><span style="font-size: 15px">H.R. 308: Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act</span></p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-308" target="_blank">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-308</a></p><p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-308" target="_blank"></a></p><p>Now in the House Judiciary Committee chaired by far-left Representative John Conyers</p><p></p><p>As I understand it - This will prohibit the <u>possession</u> or transfer of mags holding more than 10 rounds.</p><p></p><p>Representatives need to know that firearms owners are outraged over this and any other proposed infringement of the 2A.</p><p></p><p>Sample letter:</p><p>Rep. _________,</p><p></p><p>I write to voice my opposition to H.R. 308: the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act.</p><p></p><p>The Arizona shooting was a mental health issue involving a single person. There is no reason why the Second Amendment should be further infringed because of it. Large capacity magazines (more than 10 rounds) are extremely common and have their place in recreational shooting and some self-defense situations. Why deprive the lawful citizen of them while criminals will still have them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dale00, post: 1443528, member: 688"] [SIZE="4"]H.R. 308: Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act[/SIZE] [URL="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-308"]http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-308 [/URL] Now in the House Judiciary Committee chaired by far-left Representative John Conyers As I understand it - This will prohibit the [U]possession[/U] or transfer of mags holding more than 10 rounds. Representatives need to know that firearms owners are outraged over this and any other proposed infringement of the 2A. Sample letter: Rep. _________, I write to voice my opposition to H.R. 308: the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act. The Arizona shooting was a mental health issue involving a single person. There is no reason why the Second Amendment should be further infringed because of it. Large capacity magazines (more than 10 rounds) are extremely common and have their place in recreational shooting and some self-defense situations. Why deprive the lawful citizen of them while criminals will still have them? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Lautenberg / Carolyn McCarthy to reintroduce gun-ban bill
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom