Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Little bit of an eye opener
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shoot Summ" data-source="post: 2111618" data-attributes="member: 1055"><p>We hope it would have, but is there really any proof that it would?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Good information, any info on how many times guns were required or used to stop an issue?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just like we already pay for added security in many places, TSA is a prime example.</p><p></p><p>I didn't know about the Flight Deck Officer program, sounds like a great program, I could support carry by Teachers if that were a requirement. I've been through the SDA though and if that is the only requirement I have a hard time saying that <u>qualifies</u> them to carry(or anyone for that matter).</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately these days you can't categorize any single group of people(Teachers, Pilots, etc) as smart ENOUGH, or NOT smart ENOUGH, there are many in the group that are, and there are some that aren't. What's worse is there are some that aren't that don't realize it.</p><p></p><p>What is your solution to the problem then? I keep asking the same question and no one has an answer. The problem is we all want to protect our rights, and protect our families, but we don't seem to be able to produce a solid foundation for why our rights shouldn't be infringed. The other side is spinning this to show how all guns are bad and evil, and all we come up with is it's our right. We are losing this fight...</p><p></p><p>(reminder, please try to keep this a <strong><u>civil discussion</u></strong>)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shoot Summ, post: 2111618, member: 1055"] We hope it would have, but is there really any proof that it would? Good information, any info on how many times guns were required or used to stop an issue? Just like we already pay for added security in many places, TSA is a prime example. I didn't know about the Flight Deck Officer program, sounds like a great program, I could support carry by Teachers if that were a requirement. I've been through the SDA though and if that is the only requirement I have a hard time saying that [U]qualifies[/U] them to carry(or anyone for that matter). Unfortunately these days you can't categorize any single group of people(Teachers, Pilots, etc) as smart ENOUGH, or NOT smart ENOUGH, there are many in the group that are, and there are some that aren't. What's worse is there are some that aren't that don't realize it. What is your solution to the problem then? I keep asking the same question and no one has an answer. The problem is we all want to protect our rights, and protect our families, but we don't seem to be able to produce a solid foundation for why our rights shouldn't be infringed. The other side is spinning this to show how all guns are bad and evil, and all we come up with is it's our right. We are losing this fight... (reminder, please try to keep this a [B][U]civil discussion[/U][/B]) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Little bit of an eye opener
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom