Los Angeles Council Passes Ban on High-Capacity Firearm Magazines

[RugersGR8]

Gee, you'd think that them there left coasters wood figur out that if'n they'd pass sum laws makin' strete drougs illeegal that they'd solve all their'n gun problemo's two---don't cha thank? Everybuddy knows that if'n you outlaw strete drougs, the cryme rait goes down to nuttin'. Keepin' them there hi-cupassity magizines outta the hands of law abiding citizens will allso heps a big bunch two make strete cryme go down cause then those nazty strete gangs can't buys the hi-cupassity magizines either.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/29/us/los-angeles-council-passes-ban-on-high-capacity-firearm-magazines.html?_r=0
Los Angeles Council Passes Ban on High-Capacity Firearm Magazines
By JENNIFER MEDINA JULY 28, 2015
..."Anyone who already owns high-capacity magazines will have 60 days to remove them from the city or turn them over to the Police Department, which will then destroy, transfer or sell them."...

 

[RugersGR8]

If you are wondering what the OP is about, I was trying to show(through my most sarcastic and most tongue-in-cheek method) that the lib dems in LA are trying to pass another "feel good" piece of legislation/crap that won't do anything to stop the real problem. All this legislation will do is to take more 2nd Amendment Rights and gunowner rights away from law abiding citizens who want to use hi-cap mags for self defense purposes.

 

[RugersGR8]

I guess since only "hi-cap" magazines would be banned, would that mean that "belt fed" weapons would still be legal---like the one in the link below(maybe mounted on something like a Smart Car or a Toyota Prius)?

http://www.glocktalk.com/attachments/smart-car-machine-gun-jpg.255402/

 

[dennishoddy]

I thought they already had mag restrictions. They restrict everything else.

 

[Defnestor]

I thought they already had mag restrictions. They restrict everything else.

Had a ban on buying/selling, now they're banning ownership.