Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
MAGPUL takes out full page ad in Denver Post
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2110297" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>As you may know, they passed a background check requirement in addition to the mag ban. Actually they passed 4 separate gun bills. One of them was a requirement that a gun buyer has to pay for the background check that is now required by the state if it goes all the way through, which it will. Now is that not the same thing as a poll tax? That was argued by one of the congressmen today. I can't figure out how it's any different constitutionally speaking. One of the communists pushing for it argued that it wasn't the same because that there was no requirement that anyone buy a gun, so they didn't have to pay it. Last I heard was there was never a requirement for one to vote when poll taxes were in place either. God these people rub me raw!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2110297, member: 3099"] As you may know, they passed a background check requirement in addition to the mag ban. Actually they passed 4 separate gun bills. One of them was a requirement that a gun buyer has to pay for the background check that is now required by the state if it goes all the way through, which it will. Now is that not the same thing as a poll tax? That was argued by one of the congressmen today. I can't figure out how it's any different constitutionally speaking. One of the communists pushing for it argued that it wasn't the same because that there was no requirement that anyone buy a gun, so they didn't have to pay it. Last I heard was there was never a requirement for one to vote when poll taxes were in place either. God these people rub me raw! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
MAGPUL takes out full page ad in Denver Post
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom