Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Martin Shooting Clip
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Poke78" data-source="post: 1782786" data-attributes="member: 4333"><p>It is possible to have some sort of civil unrest even when the population gets a highly desired result. Proof of that would be the "riots" following Kentucky winning the Final Four. Significant property damage and arrests despite the favorable game result that the crowd in Lexington KY supported. All of it was fueled by emotion and crowd dynamics/psychology. This was all known to the local police force and they had prepared for it but could not stop it. Probably the biggest reason was the lack of a leadership function that could act to restrain the group. In Sanford FL, the leadership that has stirred things up to get the aggrieved group the media attention and desired charges against Zimmerman could act to restrain the same group upon receiving the result of the process.</p><p></p><p>The why or why not will rest totally in the leadership group. It will be able to be predicted based upon the leadership's actions and words as the process moves forward. Wise actions and calming words will restrain all but the most hot-headed that want to act out. If the wise actions and calming words are not evident, then the larger group will not feel a sense of restraint, no matter the result.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Poke78, post: 1782786, member: 4333"] It is possible to have some sort of civil unrest even when the population gets a highly desired result. Proof of that would be the "riots" following Kentucky winning the Final Four. Significant property damage and arrests despite the favorable game result that the crowd in Lexington KY supported. All of it was fueled by emotion and crowd dynamics/psychology. This was all known to the local police force and they had prepared for it but could not stop it. Probably the biggest reason was the lack of a leadership function that could act to restrain the group. In Sanford FL, the leadership that has stirred things up to get the aggrieved group the media attention and desired charges against Zimmerman could act to restrain the same group upon receiving the result of the process. The why or why not will rest totally in the leadership group. It will be able to be predicted based upon the leadership's actions and words as the process moves forward. Wise actions and calming words will restrain all but the most hot-headed that want to act out. If the wise actions and calming words are not evident, then the larger group will not feel a sense of restraint, no matter the result. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Martin Shooting Clip
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom