Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Murder Charges
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frederick" data-source="post: 2897969" data-attributes="member: 17825"><p>As much as i love arguing about racial politics...</p><p></p><p>The fact of the matter is, Massachusetts might as well be a different country. Yankee country.</p><p></p><p>These yankees see things a whole lot differently than we do. Victims don't need protecting, criminals do, In Massachusetts.</p><p></p><p>I'm just happy i live in a state that has at least some of the values i grew up with. Even if you can't completely escape some of the more liberal ideas running around.</p><p></p><p>Legally, He's ****ed, if you'll pardon my french. They don't have a castle doctrine there. Even in Oklahoma, it's hard to argue because he didn't actually enter the residence. Breaking a window is not necessarily breaking and entering. If he entered the home, in Oklahoma, it'd have been a legal shoot. in Massachusetts, you have to run away like a little girl and do everything you can feasibly do to run away before you can legally shoot as an absolute last resort. There is no castle doctrine or 'no duty to retreat' laws in Massachusetts like there is in Oklahoma.</p><p></p><p>In Oklahoma, you have to 'have reasonable belief' that a break in is or was occurring for it to be a legal shoot. </p><p></p><p>Morally, in my opinion;</p><p></p><p><strong>"If a thief is caught in the act of breaking into a house and is struck and killed in the process, the person who killed the thief is not guilty of murder." -- Exodus 22:2</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frederick, post: 2897969, member: 17825"] As much as i love arguing about racial politics... The fact of the matter is, Massachusetts might as well be a different country. Yankee country. These yankees see things a whole lot differently than we do. Victims don't need protecting, criminals do, In Massachusetts. I'm just happy i live in a state that has at least some of the values i grew up with. Even if you can't completely escape some of the more liberal ideas running around. Legally, He's ****ed, if you'll pardon my french. They don't have a castle doctrine there. Even in Oklahoma, it's hard to argue because he didn't actually enter the residence. Breaking a window is not necessarily breaking and entering. If he entered the home, in Oklahoma, it'd have been a legal shoot. in Massachusetts, you have to run away like a little girl and do everything you can feasibly do to run away before you can legally shoot as an absolute last resort. There is no castle doctrine or 'no duty to retreat' laws in Massachusetts like there is in Oklahoma. In Oklahoma, you have to 'have reasonable belief' that a break in is or was occurring for it to be a legal shoot. Morally, in my opinion; [B]"If a thief is caught in the act of breaking into a house and is struck and killed in the process, the person who killed the thief is not guilty of murder." -- Exodus 22:2[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Murder Charges
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom