It’s hard for me personally to love on the N frames, because they just don’t fit my hands.
I wear med/lg gloves, and for square butt N frames, Magna/Service grips with a Tyler-T or BK grip adapter is the sweet spot.
Targets/Cokes/Hogue/Pachmayr are all to bulky for me in a square butt N frame.
Targets/Cokes/Hogue/Pachmayr are all to bulky for me in a square butt N frame.
Agreed on the square butt, but for the RB I prefer Pachmayr Compacs. They're about the most comfortable griops on the market--at least for me.
I’ll take 3! I need a 4, 5, & the 6” to go with my Heavy Duty’s and 520.
Beautiful even with the hillary hole.
Agree - it is pretty for sure
but still wish they had kept the lock off of it
Why does S&W continue with the bung hole safety? It has to do with ease of manufacture and being able to be sold in states that require a “gun lock” but I would think they are losing sales to those of us who prefer a non-bung hole revolver.
Classy looking except that damn bung hole lock.
Classy looking except that damn bung hole lock.
The lock just kills it for me. What the hell is S&W thinking?
Geez I wish they'd dump the stupid lock from EVERY model. I do happen to own two Heavy Duty revolvers, one of which has had the charge holes reamed to accept .357 Magnum cartridges But I would like the opportunity to buy new S&W revolvers, without the lock.
Yeah, the lock needs to go.
That bunghole has me looking at Viper 4" revolvers. Gonna sell a few guns to get a Viper. Seems SW could offer it both ways. That would tell them very quickly if it was a good idea. Probably risk assessment and lawyers convinced them to put the locks on.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Do we need a class on how to post pictures for the stuff you want or want to sell?- Latest: SNAKE PLISSKEN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
