Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
NFL ratings: Initial results show decline for K.C.-Houston kickoff game
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoonerP226" data-source="post: 3422850" data-attributes="member: 26737"><p>They're also completely irrelevant. According to your own account, she wasn't enforcing gov't regulations or ordinances, she was (at least attempting to) enforce the private property owner's rules. In short, this isn't about gov't overreach, it's about private property rights.</p><p></p><p>Look at it this way. Let's say you had a pond that, out of the goodness of your heart, you decided to open up for fishing to the OSA membership, with the condition that anyone who came there to fish had to clean up their trash when they were finished. What would you think if someone left all his beer cans and Moon Pie wrappers sitting on the pond dyke, then when you confronted him, he claimed that he had a bad back and couldn't bend over to pick it up, and that you were violating city ordinances about exceptions to littering laws for handicapped persons and HIIPA privacy laws and his fourth amendment rights?</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong--Queens Breea and Bynum can stick their mask mandates where the sun don't shine, but if a private property owner tells you that you have to wear a mask to enter their premises, it seems to me that an adult will either put on the mask or leave.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoonerP226, post: 3422850, member: 26737"] They're also completely irrelevant. According to your own account, she wasn't enforcing gov't regulations or ordinances, she was (at least attempting to) enforce the private property owner's rules. In short, this isn't about gov't overreach, it's about private property rights. Look at it this way. Let's say you had a pond that, out of the goodness of your heart, you decided to open up for fishing to the OSA membership, with the condition that anyone who came there to fish had to clean up their trash when they were finished. What would you think if someone left all his beer cans and Moon Pie wrappers sitting on the pond dyke, then when you confronted him, he claimed that he had a bad back and couldn't bend over to pick it up, and that you were violating city ordinances about exceptions to littering laws for handicapped persons and HIIPA privacy laws and his fourth amendment rights? Don't get me wrong--Queens Breea and Bynum can stick their mask mandates where the sun don't shine, but if a private property owner tells you that you have to wear a mask to enter their premises, it seems to me that an adult will either put on the mask or leave. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
NFL ratings: Initial results show decline for K.C.-Houston kickoff game
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom