Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA/ORA stand on open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Brown" data-source="post: 1156979" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Let's not get so self-rightous to point to the founders as paragons of virtue or that their words/terms were so forward thinking that they are untouchable. These were just humans; nothing more.</p><p></p><p>Let's not forget that those "inalienable human rights" didn't apply to everyone.</p><p></p><p>Times change and don't forget that some terms like in the 4th amendment are not well defined in the BoR or in the Federalist Papers so they must be interpreted in the manner that the magistrate feels is most appropriate i.e. what is unreasonable? </p><p></p><p>Reasonableness has always been defined based on context. </p><p></p><p>I would also suggest that many feel "keep and bear" is also contextual i.e. at times when the government is becoming too oppressive but who decides what is too oppressive since the majority in this country probably isn't interested in an armed revolution at this time?</p><p></p><p>Michael Brown</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Brown, post: 1156979, member: 18"] Let's not get so self-rightous to point to the founders as paragons of virtue or that their words/terms were so forward thinking that they are untouchable. These were just humans; nothing more. Let's not forget that those "inalienable human rights" didn't apply to everyone. Times change and don't forget that some terms like in the 4th amendment are not well defined in the BoR or in the Federalist Papers so they must be interpreted in the manner that the magistrate feels is most appropriate i.e. what is unreasonable? Reasonableness has always been defined based on context. I would also suggest that many feel "keep and bear" is also contextual i.e. at times when the government is becoming too oppressive but who decides what is too oppressive since the majority in this country probably isn't interested in an armed revolution at this time? Michael Brown [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA/ORA stand on open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom