Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA/ORA stand on open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 1157174" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>Without absolutes one can justify just about anything. Which is exactly what is wrong with your line of argument, commonly referred to as cultural or social relativism. Cultural relativists get to pick and choose what is reasonable, right or wrong, what is acceptable and what isn't all in the name of context, or societal necessity or even religion.</p><p> </p><p>Incest? Commonly practiced by many cultures throughout history. Right or wrong.</p><p> </p><p>Cannibalism? Commonly practiced by many cultures throughout history. Right or wrong.</p><p> </p><p>Ritual murder? Commonly practiced by many cultures throughout history. Right or wrong.</p><p> </p><p>Is a religious dictatorship a good or bad thing?</p><p> </p><p>How about chunking newborn babies into the ocean because they were born with a defect (practiced by the natives of one of our 50 states - can you gues which one?)</p><p> </p><p>And the Bill of Rights is a living document to be interpreted based on "changing times", right? </p><p> </p><p>That's really worked out well hasn't it.</p><p> </p><p>"Papers please", no knock warrants, no warrant searches in the name of officer safety (can't get more reasonable than that now can we?), little ole ladies kicked out of their ancestral homes to make way for a walmart, carrying a firearm for protection is a priviledge and not a right, God has been kicked out of the schools, free speech(?) PC is gutting it even without the court's help. Speedy trial? compared to what -ROFLMAO, and the 9th and 10th amendments have been interpreted into oblivion while the interstate commerce clause in the main body of the constitution has been interpreted to the point where congress can do just about anything it wants using it as justification. the only amendment not perverted so far is the 3rd but some day the goobermint will get tired of building and paying for housing for the troops because it'll be totally reasonable to house them in our homes (for our own protection mind you) and you'll have one sitting at your dinner table every night eating your food and sleeping in your daughter's bed courtesy of the changing times and the philosophy of cultural/social relativism that rules our courts these days.</p><p> </p><p>Yeah! I'd have to say that interpreting the constitution based on the changing times has worked out oh so very well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 1157174, member: 239"] Without absolutes one can justify just about anything. Which is exactly what is wrong with your line of argument, commonly referred to as cultural or social relativism. Cultural relativists get to pick and choose what is reasonable, right or wrong, what is acceptable and what isn't all in the name of context, or societal necessity or even religion. Incest? Commonly practiced by many cultures throughout history. Right or wrong. Cannibalism? Commonly practiced by many cultures throughout history. Right or wrong. Ritual murder? Commonly practiced by many cultures throughout history. Right or wrong. Is a religious dictatorship a good or bad thing? How about chunking newborn babies into the ocean because they were born with a defect (practiced by the natives of one of our 50 states - can you gues which one?) And the Bill of Rights is a living document to be interpreted based on "changing times", right? That's really worked out well hasn't it. "Papers please", no knock warrants, no warrant searches in the name of officer safety (can't get more reasonable than that now can we?), little ole ladies kicked out of their ancestral homes to make way for a walmart, carrying a firearm for protection is a priviledge and not a right, God has been kicked out of the schools, free speech(?) PC is gutting it even without the court's help. Speedy trial? compared to what -ROFLMAO, and the 9th and 10th amendments have been interpreted into oblivion while the interstate commerce clause in the main body of the constitution has been interpreted to the point where congress can do just about anything it wants using it as justification. the only amendment not perverted so far is the 3rd but some day the goobermint will get tired of building and paying for housing for the troops because it'll be totally reasonable to house them in our homes (for our own protection mind you) and you'll have one sitting at your dinner table every night eating your food and sleeping in your daughter's bed courtesy of the changing times and the philosophy of cultural/social relativism that rules our courts these days. Yeah! I'd have to say that interpreting the constitution based on the changing times has worked out oh so very well. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA/ORA stand on open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom