Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA sits out gunfight with feds
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 1167641" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Make of it what you will but it doesn't change the plain truth. </p><p></p><p>The word "interpret" contains too broad of a list of definitions to be useful in anything as precise and unambiguous as the Constitution. If "read" and "obey" was sufficient for the first Supreme Court, it's sufficient for everyone. I don't think any subsequent Court has shot down that precedent.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No doubt that would be a bit of a disaster. The problem with the NRA resides in the Board of Directors and what I perceive as a protectionist system of "appointments masquerading as elections". That said, even the current system can be made to work if the voting record of all the current board members were made known to we the hoi polloi. Otherwise, how we vote is guesswork at best. If we were to know their voting records, we'd at least be able to decide who needs to be replaced.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 1167641, member: 745"] Make of it what you will but it doesn't change the plain truth. The word "interpret" contains too broad of a list of definitions to be useful in anything as precise and unambiguous as the Constitution. If "read" and "obey" was sufficient for the first Supreme Court, it's sufficient for everyone. I don't think any subsequent Court has shot down that precedent. No doubt that would be a bit of a disaster. The problem with the NRA resides in the Board of Directors and what I perceive as a protectionist system of "appointments masquerading as elections". That said, even the current system can be made to work if the voting record of all the current board members were made known to we the hoi polloi. Otherwise, how we vote is guesswork at best. If we were to know their voting records, we'd at least be able to decide who needs to be replaced. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
NRA sits out gunfight with feds
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom