Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Obama invokes executive privilege as Holder faces contempt vote
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 1825528" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>This.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And this.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? I can't listen to 15 minutes of conservative talk radio without hearing another blatant lie about history, with the exception of Boortz.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Considering how Republicans like to place Reagan on a pedestal above God, I think the "conservatives" have succeeded in their rewrite. Ever read church sermons regarding separation of church and state quoting early SCOTUS opinions? Most of those take a hypothetical about the negative impacts of integration and quote it out of context claiming that the SCOTUS supported integration of church and state. I don't fault the preachers for not checking facts on the sermons they repeat, though - I fault the authors for misleading the public.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He also supported the failed efforts in Congress during his term.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So because the ATF abused their power under Carter, it's okay for Reagan to support specifically the amendment to prohibit the private ownership of full autos manufactured after May ##, 1986? Or his VERY vocal support and lobbying in Congress for passage of the 1994 AWB?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 1825528, member: 5151"] This. And this. Really? I can't listen to 15 minutes of conservative talk radio without hearing another blatant lie about history, with the exception of Boortz. Considering how Republicans like to place Reagan on a pedestal above God, I think the "conservatives" have succeeded in their rewrite. Ever read church sermons regarding separation of church and state quoting early SCOTUS opinions? Most of those take a hypothetical about the negative impacts of integration and quote it out of context claiming that the SCOTUS supported integration of church and state. I don't fault the preachers for not checking facts on the sermons they repeat, though - I fault the authors for misleading the public. He also supported the failed efforts in Congress during his term. So because the ATF abused their power under Carter, it's okay for Reagan to support specifically the amendment to prohibit the private ownership of full autos manufactured after May ##, 1986? Or his VERY vocal support and lobbying in Congress for passage of the 1994 AWB? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Obama invokes executive privilege as Holder faces contempt vote
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
