An uncomplimentary assessment of the President's ineffective leadership:
But the idea of universal background checks still hangs on like a naval mine waiting for an unlucky ship:
...The gun control debate has shown the president again to be hopelessly detached as a legislative mechanic and ineffectual as a shaper of public opinion. Before writing rhetorical checks that his own partys majority leader in the Senate, Harry Reid, couldnt cash, the president might have at least consulted with the wily old son-of-a-gun about what was plausible and adjusted accordingly. He might have taken into consideration Reids ribbon-cutting ceremony with National Rifle Association honcho Wayne LaPierre at the Clark County Shooting Park in Las Vegas in 2010.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/...t-gun-control-fizzle-89628.html#ixzz2Pq8IIMxM
But the idea of universal background checks still hangs on like a naval mine waiting for an unlucky ship:
...The argument now is all about increasing the reach of background checks, although any bill that can pass the Senate and the House will be much less extensive than the president or his supporters would like.....
It is true that 90 percent of Americans support universal background checks. Who can be against background checks? Heck, even the NRA wants states to keep more complete records of who is forbidden from purchasing guns....
But it gets complicated quickly when you try to control almost every transfer of a gun. The current Sen. Chuck Schumer version of the background check bill would forbid a temporary transfer to a friend for target shooting if the range is not owned or occupied by a duly incorporated organization organized for conservation purposes or to foster proficiency in firearms. Got it?
Surely, we can figure out a way to do more checks at gun shows. But despite the obsession with them, gun shows are really beside the point. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, In 1997, among state inmates possessing a gun, fewer than 2 percent bought their firearm at a flea market or gun show, about 12 percent from a retail store or pawnshop and 80 percent from family, friends, a street buy or an illegal source.
Gun control always founders on the fundamental paradox that it is possible to write new laws for the law-abiding but difficult or impossible to reach criminals who dont care about the laws. Michigan has long had one of the most-restrictive gun laws in the country. It has required a permit to purchase a handgun since 1927. The rule has evidently made no impression on those bent on doing harm to others in Detroit or Flint....
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/...control-fizzle-89628_Page2.html#ixzz2PqBduFrt