Much speculation and innuendo in this thread.
**snip**
So can't wait to see what Prater does. **snip**
It's the OSA way!!
And I'm with you. I'm curious to see how he handles this one.
Much speculation and innuendo in this thread.
**snip**
So can't wait to see what Prater does. **snip**
Oh man! I was officially Snipped!
Yup. Time to put up or shut up.
I think everyone that's old enough to legally buy a firearm understands the sanctity of the polling place. There are a plethoria of laws that govern the conduct in and around them. There are rules that even dictate how close political signs can be placed. If you think that openly carrying and brandishing a firearm in a polling place is okay then I'm sure you're probably okay with the use of members of the New Black Panther party to provide security at them as well....
There's really no one here more quick to point a finger, judge someone and throw down a verdict based on a sketchy news article without all the facts.
Meet the kettle, Mr. pot.
If you think that openly carrying and brandishing a firearm in a polling place is okay then I'm sure you're probably okay with the use of members of the New Black Panther party to provide security at them as well....
I tend to agree with Mymonkey. Not sure the polling places (church or community center, bank or school gym) is that closely defined as a state sanctioned operation to be a no carry zone. The comparison you make is ludicrous though. These guys were there to intimidate and scare people. Quite a different situation and your "old" enough to know GD good and well.
So we read intent from the presence of a weapon now?
Seems to be just like the open carriers who carry for effect.
Although I suspect there are some folks here who wouldn't have a problem with it if these guys were white and voting Republican.
Michael Brown
Enter your email address to join: