Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Oklahoma HB1059 - SDA Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 2065025" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>It appears to me that it is written in such a way that a strict interpration makes OC illegal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's the sneaky part. His intent may just be to clarify that accidental exposure when carrying concealed is no longer a crime but that's not the way it reads. The statement is ambiguous enough that OC is iffy IMO.</p><p></p><p>Then again IANAL. We need some of our legal eagles like JB or Henschman to weigh in on this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 2065025, member: 239"] It appears to me that it is written in such a way that a strict interpration makes OC illegal. That's the sneaky part. His intent may just be to clarify that accidental exposure when carrying concealed is no longer a crime but that's not the way it reads. The statement is ambiguous enough that OC is iffy IMO. Then again IANAL. We need some of our legal eagles like JB or Henschman to weigh in on this. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Oklahoma HB1059 - SDA Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom