Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma judge finds aspect of state execution law unconstitutional
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cohiba" data-source="post: 2466888" data-attributes="member: 2550"><p>Some of the points I was trying to make were: A) What's the backup plan if anyone else contests cruel and unusual punishment?</p><p></p><p>B). At the lowest level, the State needs to devise execution that would be a mute point. Certified by "experts"-doctors, in the field dealing with death. They use them for professional testimony, why not certified/professional opinion. This needs to be done at the Federal level also. </p><p></p><p>C) As mentioned in this post, what is wrong with hanging...really snapping a neck? Seems its fairly quick and an immediate form of death. Firing squad...quick and immediate. How quick and inhumane is electrocution? Not the Guillotine. .in many peoples eyes (not mine) that would seem a draconian method.</p><p></p><p>If the main argument is lingering and painful death, it would seem to me to find resesrch on the three I have mentioned (hanging, firing squad, and electrocution) and do a comparison study on time of death and if the executed "complained" of having to linger and wait for a slow death....such as the "slow" death the prisoners are complaing about. You know..like when the doctor has to certify death...even though everyone knows they're dead...but it has to be official.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Bottom line a backup plan needs to be implemented now, to resolve future issues!!! Or just find one, have it medically certified and follow through with it. When it's state medically certified..I mean one that is almost impossible to argue. I know, I know..have another certified doctor argue against it.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure injection was certified, prescribed, and carfully studied before it wqs implemented. ..by medical staff.</p><p></p><p>What gets me is how can they argue this procedure?? Medical malpractice under lingering and painful death???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cohiba, post: 2466888, member: 2550"] Some of the points I was trying to make were: A) What's the backup plan if anyone else contests cruel and unusual punishment? B). At the lowest level, the State needs to devise execution that would be a mute point. Certified by "experts"-doctors, in the field dealing with death. They use them for professional testimony, why not certified/professional opinion. This needs to be done at the Federal level also. C) As mentioned in this post, what is wrong with hanging...really snapping a neck? Seems its fairly quick and an immediate form of death. Firing squad...quick and immediate. How quick and inhumane is electrocution? Not the Guillotine. .in many peoples eyes (not mine) that would seem a draconian method. If the main argument is lingering and painful death, it would seem to me to find resesrch on the three I have mentioned (hanging, firing squad, and electrocution) and do a comparison study on time of death and if the executed "complained" of having to linger and wait for a slow death....such as the "slow" death the prisoners are complaing about. You know..like when the doctor has to certify death...even though everyone knows they're dead...but it has to be official. Bottom line a backup plan needs to be implemented now, to resolve future issues!!! Or just find one, have it medically certified and follow through with it. When it's state medically certified..I mean one that is almost impossible to argue. I know, I know..have another certified doctor argue against it. I'm sure injection was certified, prescribed, and carfully studied before it wqs implemented. ..by medical staff. What gets me is how can they argue this procedure?? Medical malpractice under lingering and painful death??? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oklahoma judge finds aspect of state execution law unconstitutional
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom