Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
One-buck proposal for the combined muzzleloader and gun seasons
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Parks 788" data-source="post: 2002017" data-attributes="member: 14646"><p>To Okie4570: No, I have never don't the "using the wife's tag" thing. I enjoy my hunting and firearms too much to try it. Plus, I have the type of luck that I would get caught doing something like that. Benefits don't outweight the negatives.</p><p></p><p>Allout: I really don't think upping the price will have any effect on the quality of bucks. First, you mention all the rich Texans are coming up to shoot Okie bucks and driving up the price of hunting leases. Well, those rich Texans won't blink an eye when paying the higher non resident fee. They will still come. Yea, you say, but what about all the others that aren't rich but do come to OK to hunt? Probably lose a lot of that "business". Almost like you are using the "tax the rich to solve the budget" issue. Never works.</p><p></p><p>Second, if money was an issue and the wildlife dept had more money they could better manage the states herd them why not just double or triple the OK resident lic and tags? It will allow the dept to have more money thus benefiting the deer herd. You probably don't like that idea though.</p><p></p><p>Third, like I said in an earlier post, when OK has the consistent high quality, huge bucks like Kansas, Iowa or Saskachawan (sp) then it makes it difficult to start charging extreme fees to any hunter.</p><p></p><p>All in all, it sounds like yours and some others take greater issue with the rich guys coming in and buying up or leasing quality hunting land. In reality, like them ranch I hunt on, just because the land is owned by a very wealthy man it doesn't mean that if he didn't own it the average Joe Oklahoman would have the opportunity to hunt it. </p><p></p><p>I would bet that there is far more unethical crap ( shooting forkhorns, etc) that goes on on public land and small private property than goes on on large high dollar leased land.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Parks 788, post: 2002017, member: 14646"] To Okie4570: No, I have never don't the "using the wife's tag" thing. I enjoy my hunting and firearms too much to try it. Plus, I have the type of luck that I would get caught doing something like that. Benefits don't outweight the negatives. Allout: I really don't think upping the price will have any effect on the quality of bucks. First, you mention all the rich Texans are coming up to shoot Okie bucks and driving up the price of hunting leases. Well, those rich Texans won't blink an eye when paying the higher non resident fee. They will still come. Yea, you say, but what about all the others that aren't rich but do come to OK to hunt? Probably lose a lot of that "business". Almost like you are using the "tax the rich to solve the budget" issue. Never works. Second, if money was an issue and the wildlife dept had more money they could better manage the states herd them why not just double or triple the OK resident lic and tags? It will allow the dept to have more money thus benefiting the deer herd. You probably don't like that idea though. Third, like I said in an earlier post, when OK has the consistent high quality, huge bucks like Kansas, Iowa or Saskachawan (sp) then it makes it difficult to start charging extreme fees to any hunter. All in all, it sounds like yours and some others take greater issue with the rich guys coming in and buying up or leasing quality hunting land. In reality, like them ranch I hunt on, just because the land is owned by a very wealthy man it doesn't mean that if he didn't own it the average Joe Oklahoman would have the opportunity to hunt it. I would bet that there is far more unethical crap ( shooting forkhorns, etc) that goes on on public land and small private property than goes on on large high dollar leased land. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
One-buck proposal for the combined muzzleloader and gun seasons
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom