Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bettingpython" data-source="post: 1474705" data-attributes="member: 4307">There are lot&#039;s of non felons who shouldn&#039;t be allowed near a firearm because they are plumb dumb, and their are felons who have done their time and should not have their right to own firearms removed.&nbsp;That&#039;s a huge ball of wax question, should someone who is convicted of embezzelement have their gun ownership rights stripped from them? I think not, once a person has served their time and reentered society they should have the right to protect themself jsut like anyone especially if they are non violent or not habitual offenders.&nbsp;The question is where do you stand? &nbsp;I am pretty darn libretarian myself. Lots of people drink to excess yet have committed no crime and have firearms, I think a BS felony conviction for something like weed shouldn&#039;t stand in the way of a person excercising their right to self defense or doing their civic duty of serving on a jury or voting.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bettingpython, post: 1474705, member: 4307"] There are lot's of non felons who shouldn't be allowed near a firearm because they are plumb dumb, and their are felons who have done their time and should not have their right to own firearms removed. That's a huge ball of wax question, should someone who is convicted of embezzelement have their gun ownership rights stripped from them? I think not, once a person has served their time and reentered society they should have the right to protect themself jsut like anyone especially if they are non violent or not habitual offenders. The question is where do you stand? I am pretty darn libretarian myself. Lots of people drink to excess yet have committed no crime and have firearms, I think a BS felony conviction for something like weed shouldn't stand in the way of a person excercising their right to self defense or doing their civic duty of serving on a jury or voting. [/QUOTE]

Verification