Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Seth247" data-source="post: 1488890" data-attributes="member: 12010"><p>That was the biggest joke of the day. They pass a holiday to honor a supreme court descision that defines the individual right to bear arms, but when the actuall bill addressing said right comes up they hemm and haw blatantly ignoring that current Oklahoma law is in violation of that exact decision and the very amendment they named it after. </p><p></p><p>Every day I am reminded just how many truly incompetent people there are in the world. </p><p></p><p>And the best part is, the second amendment isn't even in hard to understand-ese. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." now since the supreme court, in that decision, recognized the RKBA as an individual right, not just applying to a militia, then by law that means the second amendment is to be interpreted thus- "the right of the individual to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."</p><p></p><p>For anybody that doesn't own Mr. Webster's book, the definition of infringed is: </p><p>1. (tr) to violate or break (a law, an agreement, etc.)</p><p>2. (intr; foll by on or upon) to encroach or trespass</p><p></p><p>Note that second part, "encroach" so, applying that, and the fact that the Second amendment doesnt have an "except for any arms that the government doesnt think they should have," clause at the end, and the SA can be read thus: "the right of the individual to keep any arms, and bear them in any way he should wish, shall not be trespassed or encroached upon in any way."</p><p></p><p>Now, why someone can't explain that to the people who swore to supposedly uphold such laws, or how any honest person could refute such explanation, I cant easily fathom. But then I never can understand women either. <img src="/images/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Seth247, post: 1488890, member: 12010"] That was the biggest joke of the day. They pass a holiday to honor a supreme court descision that defines the individual right to bear arms, but when the actuall bill addressing said right comes up they hemm and haw blatantly ignoring that current Oklahoma law is in violation of that exact decision and the very amendment they named it after. Every day I am reminded just how many truly incompetent people there are in the world. And the best part is, the second amendment isn't even in hard to understand-ese. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." now since the supreme court, in that decision, recognized the RKBA as an individual right, not just applying to a militia, then by law that means the second amendment is to be interpreted thus- "the right of the individual to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." For anybody that doesn't own Mr. Webster's book, the definition of infringed is: 1. (tr) to violate or break (a law, an agreement, etc.) 2. (intr; foll by on or upon) to encroach or trespass Note that second part, "encroach" so, applying that, and the fact that the Second amendment doesnt have an "except for any arms that the government doesnt think they should have," clause at the end, and the SA can be read thus: "the right of the individual to keep any arms, and bear them in any way he should wish, shall not be trespassed or encroached upon in any way." Now, why someone can't explain that to the people who swore to supposedly uphold such laws, or how any honest person could refute such explanation, I cant easily fathom. But then I never can understand women either. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
