Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 1493413" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>That's kind'a like choosing between really really evil and really really really evil. No choice at all.</p><p></p><p>Sometimes when making a choice becomes necessary making no choice at all becomes the best option.</p><p></p><p>I truly appreciate the efforts organizations like OK2A make for us but when the effort is misguided - not so much... 1647 would have - if passed as written - set the OC cause back by years.</p><p></p><p>Unlicensed OC? Please. IMO what it was was a smokescreen so politicians could say look, see, we're pro 2A and pro OC. When in fact they are neither. Passage of 1674 as OC would have been meaningless due to the onerous restrictions that must be met to exercise OC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 1493413, member: 239"] That's kind'a like choosing between really really evil and really really really evil. No choice at all. Sometimes when making a choice becomes necessary making no choice at all becomes the best option. I truly appreciate the efforts organizations like OK2A make for us but when the effort is misguided - not so much... 1647 would have - if passed as written - set the OC cause back by years. Unlicensed OC? Please. IMO what it was was a smokescreen so politicians could say look, see, we're pro 2A and pro OC. When in fact they are neither. Passage of 1674 as OC would have been meaningless due to the onerous restrictions that must be met to exercise OC. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Open carry?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
