Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oregon Militia take over federal building
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mightymouse" data-source="post: 2833248" data-attributes="member: 15253"><p>You might be a heartless bastard that doesn't care about children, but thankfully most of us don't agree with you. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p>P.S., you failed miserably in refuting ANY of the points I made. Well, except you think what the .gov did to those kids was acceptable.</p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where to start...let's see--I didn't refute any of your points. Do I have to? Is it a rule? Perhaps its a requirement for full membership in OSA's Perpetually Aggrieved, Perennially Disappointed, Positively Grumpy All the Time Old Fart's Club Debate Society? But here is a point to debate at the next meeting of the OSAPAPDPGATOFCDS: is a main gun a necessary condition by which a large, tracked vehicle becomes a tank? Because the two M1A1 Abrams "tanks" at Waco had their main guns disabled. Without their main armament, are they tanks, or simply large, tracked vehicles, such as a Caterpillar bulldozer, say? Anyway, please debate that point at your club's next get together.</p><p></p><p>In any event, I don't recall saying that the FBI operated any "tanks", but perhaps it was a simple oversight by my cadre of copy-editors, all of whom, I hasten to add, I have suspended indefinitely due to my suspicion that they may have been moonlighting for another member. My guess, though, is that since relatively few FBI agents are instructed in the finer points of M1A1 Abrams tank operations, they probably did have soldiers operating those large, tracked vehicles (with, you'll remember, their main guns disabled). </p><p></p><p>Heartless bastard?? Does this mean I'm out of the running for OSA's Humanitarian of the Year (what, again?!?)? Rest assured, dear sir, that based on the compassion you have universally displayed, in this thread and in others, if I have a vote, you will get my endorsement as OSA's Humanitarian of the Year (yes, again!).</p><p></p><p>One point, though. On any given day, 150,000 people worldwide die. On that day in Waco, when several dozen Branch Davidian idiots went to meet their Maker, another 149,900 and some-odd other people also met their Waterloo. To have cried for them all would mean that you would have to have more tears at your disposal than even our venerated President during his latest national address.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, I hope I have addressed some of the points you were curious about. Good day to you, sir!</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="mightymouse, post: 2833248, member: 15253"] You might be a heartless bastard that doesn't care about children, but thankfully most of us don't agree with you. :( P.S., you failed miserably in refuting ANY of the points I made. Well, except you think what the .gov did to those kids was acceptable.[/QUOTE] Where to start...let's see--I didn't refute any of your points. Do I have to? Is it a rule? Perhaps its a requirement for full membership in OSA's Perpetually Aggrieved, Perennially Disappointed, Positively Grumpy All the Time Old Fart's Club Debate Society? But here is a point to debate at the next meeting of the OSAPAPDPGATOFCDS: is a main gun a necessary condition by which a large, tracked vehicle becomes a tank? Because the two M1A1 Abrams "tanks" at Waco had their main guns disabled. Without their main armament, are they tanks, or simply large, tracked vehicles, such as a Caterpillar bulldozer, say? Anyway, please debate that point at your club's next get together. In any event, I don't recall saying that the FBI operated any "tanks", but perhaps it was a simple oversight by my cadre of copy-editors, all of whom, I hasten to add, I have suspended indefinitely due to my suspicion that they may have been moonlighting for another member. My guess, though, is that since relatively few FBI agents are instructed in the finer points of M1A1 Abrams tank operations, they probably did have soldiers operating those large, tracked vehicles (with, you'll remember, their main guns disabled). Heartless bastard?? Does this mean I'm out of the running for OSA's Humanitarian of the Year (what, again?!?)? Rest assured, dear sir, that based on the compassion you have universally displayed, in this thread and in others, if I have a vote, you will get my endorsement as OSA's Humanitarian of the Year (yes, again!). One point, though. On any given day, 150,000 people worldwide die. On that day in Waco, when several dozen Branch Davidian idiots went to meet their Maker, another 149,900 and some-odd other people also met their Waterloo. To have cried for them all would mean that you would have to have more tears at your disposal than even our venerated President during his latest national address. Anyway, I hope I have addressed some of the points you were curious about. Good day to you, sir! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Oregon Militia take over federal building
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom