You must be referring to Pelosi.
The one and only time I'd be on her side.
You must be referring to Pelosi.
The one and only time I'd be on her side.
Not to inject anything useful into this thread, but we have a display at work that rotates through the three major cable "news" networks, and I'm pretty sure they all had some coverage of Bibi's speech. Of course, the "news" channels all look alike, I do have a job that consumes an inordinate amount of my time during working hours (of all the nerve), and I didn't particularly care about this particular speech, so I couldn't swear that the coverage wasn't all on one channel.Not entirely, no. However; I'm 100% certain that they showed clips which is the bar I have to clear here.
I think the most recently exposed lie ( I'm doing my best to keep up) is O'Reilly's claim to have been on the porch in Florida at the moment that Mohrenschildt committed suicide. I'm not sure he's even defending that yet.
His co-workers claim that he was in a studio in Dallas at the time. That's understandable because they are part of a vast farleft conspiracy to nail America's last honest man to a cross. But, how do you account for the fact that O'Reilly's name doesn't appear in the police report and he didn't file a story on a historical event that he found himself in the middle of? Why did he wait 35 years to tell this story?
Why did he call a congressional investigator to verify that the suicide occurred when he was at the scene of the suicide?
SEMANTICS, That's why.
One more thing that shows he has zero respect for the intelligence of his audience. I guess that's what's got him where he is. Can't argue with success. O'Reilly will survive and O'Reilly will prevail.
Which instance? When she was so eggregiously offended by Bibi's simpleton speech? Or when she stood with neocons in supporting a war for oil?
When she was offended by Bibi's speech for simpletons.
Based on what we've seen from the United States Congress over the past couple of decades, how could anyone fault him for dumbing down his speech to them?
That is a good point.
Even so, having a foreign leader (or foreign-interest group) dictate U.S. policy is treachery.
Enter your email address to join: