Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Question for the LE
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ethan N" data-source="post: 2164972" data-attributes="member: 29267"><p>Completely agree! I <em>don't</em> think it is right for LE to disarm someone who is not doing or doesn't appear to be doing anything criminal or suspicious. I don't consider being stopped for a traffic violation to be criminal or suspicious in that sense (even though a traffic stop is an important opportunity to investigate other potential criminal activity). Thankfully, most cops in Oklahoma seem to realize that the fact that someone has an SDA license in their pocket means they're almost definitely friend, not foe. I want police to have the option to disarm a subject, if a situation calls for it, but I dislike that some make it their own personal standard procedure. However, I've always been taught and will always practice that you do what LE tells you to do. If they do something wrong, comply now, complain later. If a cop disarms me for no good reason, I'll be peeved, then I'll get on with my life. It's no big deal.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Tell me about it. I won't have to learn that lesson twice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ethan N, post: 2164972, member: 29267"] Completely agree! I [I]don't[/I] think it is right for LE to disarm someone who is not doing or doesn't appear to be doing anything criminal or suspicious. I don't consider being stopped for a traffic violation to be criminal or suspicious in that sense (even though a traffic stop is an important opportunity to investigate other potential criminal activity). Thankfully, most cops in Oklahoma seem to realize that the fact that someone has an SDA license in their pocket means they're almost definitely friend, not foe. I want police to have the option to disarm a subject, if a situation calls for it, but I dislike that some make it their own personal standard procedure. However, I've always been taught and will always practice that you do what LE tells you to do. If they do something wrong, comply now, complain later. If a cop disarms me for no good reason, I'll be peeved, then I'll get on with my life. It's no big deal. Tell me about it. I won't have to learn that lesson twice. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
Question for the LE
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom