Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Researching the 2ndA & the NRA
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vvvvvvv" data-source="post: 2321686" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>Source?</p><p></p><p>Or just drivel from the brainwashing?</p><p></p><p>If anecdotal, then I haven't seen any NRA supporters personally be active in opposing or submitting legislation.</p><p></p><p>Remember, the NRA changed out an argument in McDonald not because the Court wouldn't touch the original argument (the Court even said they'd have liked to), but to solidify the continued litigation of what the Second Amendment does and does not apply to. The original argument would have treated it as a all-encompassing privilege and immunity of being a U.S. citizen; the NRA's argument was that the Second Amendment applied only in specific situations subject to "due process".</p><p></p><p>I can't in good conscience support an organization like the NRA.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vvvvvvv, post: 2321686, member: 5151"] Source? Or just drivel from the brainwashing? If anecdotal, then I haven't seen any NRA supporters personally be active in opposing or submitting legislation. Remember, the NRA changed out an argument in McDonald not because the Court wouldn't touch the original argument (the Court even said they'd have liked to), but to solidify the continued litigation of what the Second Amendment does and does not apply to. The original argument would have treated it as a all-encompassing privilege and immunity of being a U.S. citizen; the NRA's argument was that the Second Amendment applied only in specific situations subject to "due process". I can't in good conscience support an organization like the NRA. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Researching the 2ndA & the NRA
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom