Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Ron Paul!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nraman" data-source="post: 1613265" data-attributes="member: 10001"><p>I think we should keep it. Many things happen in a life time and a person can end up with nothing. At that point you have two choices, let him die like a dog in the streets or take care of him. I don't see people dying in the streets, so, I think it is best that that person gets money from a program he financed.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I know people like that also. I know a guy that has a kid with birth defects, he can afford to pay but chooses to use free money. A complete overhaul is needed, no question about it.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>You don't just get "your fair share", you invest in an insurance type of program. If you die in the SS office while applying for SS, you get nothing if you get lucky you get a lot more than you put in.</p><p>You and I buy a brand new car with full coverage and one of us totals it out of the dealers parking lot and the other keeps it perfect for twenty years, you might see it as unfair or just how things work.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Hey, your retirement is your responsibility, you are smart and capable. Good for you. What happens if you like so many others end up with nothing, it happens for a variety of reasons some beyond their control. Should I pay you to stay alive even though you never participated? Do we let people die of starvation? I suppose it depends on a person's vision of what a society should be. Normally the words country and society indicate people united in some way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nraman, post: 1613265, member: 10001"] I think we should keep it. Many things happen in a life time and a person can end up with nothing. At that point you have two choices, let him die like a dog in the streets or take care of him. I don't see people dying in the streets, so, I think it is best that that person gets money from a program he financed. I know people like that also. I know a guy that has a kid with birth defects, he can afford to pay but chooses to use free money. A complete overhaul is needed, no question about it. You don't just get "your fair share", you invest in an insurance type of program. If you die in the SS office while applying for SS, you get nothing if you get lucky you get a lot more than you put in. You and I buy a brand new car with full coverage and one of us totals it out of the dealers parking lot and the other keeps it perfect for twenty years, you might see it as unfair or just how things work. Hey, your retirement is your responsibility, you are smart and capable. Good for you. What happens if you like so many others end up with nothing, it happens for a variety of reasons some beyond their control. Should I pay you to stay alive even though you never participated? Do we let people die of starvation? I suppose it depends on a person's vision of what a society should be. Normally the words country and society indicate people united in some way. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Ron Paul!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom