Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 1786880" data-attributes="member: 3553">4 states have constitutional carry, with a fifth, Montana, having it in some parts. 11 states are considering it, according to: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Carry" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Carry</a>I don't think the LEOs in these states are handicapped between discriminating between good and bad guys based on who is carrying and who is not The whole point of Const Carry is that it is a natural right. Today, does an LEO have extra sensory perception to determine if someone is a good or bad guy just by looking at them? No. So why should people exercising a natural right be used to evaluate if someone is good or bad. Why should an LEO pay special attention to someone Const Carrying peacably? Basically, if the right to bear was exercised more frequently, it would become a more natural part of societal norms. Reality today is that even in states with Const Carry, the right is rarely exercised, except in rural areas. some anti RKBA folk argue that lots of people carrying  would take us back to the days of the wild west. Well, the  days of the wild west were a HECK of a lot safer than the times we live in today. See: <a href="http://davidgalbraith.org/myth-busting/the-wild-west-was-much-safer-than-new-york-at-its-safest/1722/" target="_blank">http://davidgalbraith.org/myth-busting/the-wild-west-was-much-safer-than-new-york-at-its-safest/1722/</a><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification