Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
SCOTUS Healthcare Ruling
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RidgeHunter" data-source="post: 1829469" data-attributes="member: 4319"><p>I'd disagree with with that. He continued FDR's programs, expanded social security, and vehemently opposed reducing tax rates that would get him lynched on OSA. Like Hobbes said, take into account the (corporate) tax rate in that era.</p><p></p><p>The quickness to bash our generation for our economic expectations, by our own peers, is funny to me. Myself and none of my peers I know expect to be able to have anywhere close to the lifestyle our grandparents had with the same education and same type of employment. What's a pension? What's a labor union? (unions were booming in the 50's, funny the bootstrap generation thrived off of what today's Republicans blame every evil of the world on - bootstrap folks shouldn't need unions...right?), what's a pension plan? You mean work pays you AFTER you quit? Get outta here. What's 40 years and a gold watch?</p><p></p><p>Our generation sucks for many reasons, but we certainly aren't dealing with a drastically cushier economic reality than the baby boomers or their parents (post-WWII family starters) faced. I don't feel "entitled" to any of the things people 50 years ago took for granted - because they don't exist anymore.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RidgeHunter, post: 1829469, member: 4319"] I'd disagree with with that. He continued FDR's programs, expanded social security, and vehemently opposed reducing tax rates that would get him lynched on OSA. Like Hobbes said, take into account the (corporate) tax rate in that era. The quickness to bash our generation for our economic expectations, by our own peers, is funny to me. Myself and none of my peers I know expect to be able to have anywhere close to the lifestyle our grandparents had with the same education and same type of employment. What's a pension? What's a labor union? (unions were booming in the 50's, funny the bootstrap generation thrived off of what today's Republicans blame every evil of the world on - bootstrap folks shouldn't need unions...right?), what's a pension plan? You mean work pays you AFTER you quit? Get outta here. What's 40 years and a gold watch? Our generation sucks for many reasons, but we certainly aren't dealing with a drastically cushier economic reality than the baby boomers or their parents (post-WWII family starters) faced. I don't feel "entitled" to any of the things people 50 years ago took for granted - because they don't exist anymore. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
SCOTUS Healthcare Ruling
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom