Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
SCOTUS Healthcare Ruling
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="71buickfreak" data-source="post: 1829873" data-attributes="member: 8373"><p>I have thought about what you said about Roberts this morning. He could very well have been playing the game and really jacking with Obama's "no tax" thing. I have a hard time believing that though, as that is a risky move and he just handed obama a huge victory that he will tought. The libs will just say that 4 judges say it's not a tax and that is legal. Roberts opinion is moot. </p><p></p><p>The health care bill has some good parts- no discriminating against sick people for instance. I have diabetes, I can't anything but state-funded healthcare, period. If I worked for a corp, I would have to wait at least a year before being covered. Not my fault I have diabetes, but I can't get coverage. That said, I stopped my InsureOK coverage, I go to the doc 2-3 times a year for $65 a pop. I was paying $100 a month before. When I worked for a corp, I was paying $265 for myself and my wife. My mom was paying $700 a month and she worked for the state. Fix the problems, you don't just force everyone to buy into the broken system. greed for greed and greed for power. Makes me sick.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="71buickfreak, post: 1829873, member: 8373"] I have thought about what you said about Roberts this morning. He could very well have been playing the game and really jacking with Obama's "no tax" thing. I have a hard time believing that though, as that is a risky move and he just handed obama a huge victory that he will tought. The libs will just say that 4 judges say it's not a tax and that is legal. Roberts opinion is moot. The health care bill has some good parts- no discriminating against sick people for instance. I have diabetes, I can't anything but state-funded healthcare, period. If I worked for a corp, I would have to wait at least a year before being covered. Not my fault I have diabetes, but I can't get coverage. That said, I stopped my InsureOK coverage, I go to the doc 2-3 times a year for $65 a pop. I was paying $100 a month before. When I worked for a corp, I was paying $265 for myself and my wife. My mom was paying $700 a month and she worked for the state. Fix the problems, you don't just force everyone to buy into the broken system. greed for greed and greed for power. Makes me sick. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
SCOTUS Healthcare Ruling
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom