SEAL Who Shot Osama bin Laden: There Should Be Limits on ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’ - Then Backpedals Tweet

[golddigger14s]

I met a retired 1st SGT and he said civilians should not have AR's/AK's. Our conversation came to a quick end.

 

[Subsonic]

https://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/politics-government/article262125247.html

 

[dennishoddy]

https://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/politics-government/article262125247.html

That Major General hasn't had a firearm in his hands since he made field officer and is using his rank to offer credentials to his insane statement by a liberal military officer.
The AR platform is not a weapon of war. It was never designed to be in a war, has never been used in a war and will never be used in a war.
On the other hand, a flintlock was designed as a weapon of war, and used in multiple wars, so which weapon should we fear most? A true weapon of war?
I know that's a simple analogy that is just as dumb as this Major General saying the AR is a weapon of war when it's not.

 

[Blue Heeler]

Another.....I'm more "American"....cause I was in the military,...But really ...I'm a paper hero and cowardly country sell out political tool ....cause my unit DID something...but it WAS,.... ME ME ME ...not a team


Wet Start John McCain...Resting in hell with Stalin and Mao

Patch eye Crewshaw......waiting for this one eyed loser to declare ,...he's a woman

Going for “shrill”? Well played.

 

[RETOKSQUID]

Weapon of war or not, the founding fathers intended for all citizens to have acces to weapons of war as a last line against a run away government.

 

[BillM]

That Major General hasn't had a firearm in his hands since he made field officer and is using his rank to offer credentials to his insane statement by a liberal military officer.
The AR platform is not a weapon of war. It was never designed to be in a war, has never been used in a war and will never be used in a war.
On the other hand, a flintlock was designed as a weapon of war, and used in multiple wars, so which weapon should we fear most? A true weapon of war?
I know that's a simple analogy that is just as dumb as this Major General saying the AR is a weapon of war when it's not.

My 1903 Springfield was designed as a weapon of war, and used as such in two wars and a number of other actions that were not declared wars. AR-15's are less powerful, less accurate at longer ranges, and don't have the select-fire capabilities of more modern weapons of war like the M-16 & M4 even when chambered for the same cartridge. I'm a Master Sergeant. How in heck would that change or affect the other facts I just cited? Not a bit, IMO. AR-15's are not a weapon of war! I don't care much for them, but I cannot see that they are inherently more dangerous than my Springfield. I'm also pretty sure that I could use my Ruger 10/22 as a weapon of war. Wars have been fought with rocks and sticks for quite a bit longer than firearms of any sort have existed.

 

[mr ed]

That seal better watch out or Obama Bin Biden will bust a cap in his ass.

 

[JD8]

Gotta love the false appeal to authority to anyone in the military.

 

[JEVapa]

I met a retired 1st SGT and he said civilians should not have AR's/AK's. Our conversation came to a quick end.

At Sill? Some soft staff type guy that gets disability because he fell off his launcher the one and only time he went to the woods?

 

[JEVapa]

https://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/politics-government/article262125247.html

Apparently General Eatadik is on the democrat payroll and just said "f*ck the Constitution and my oath to protect it".