Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Semi-Auto Battle Rifle... Which one?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman" data-source="post: 1670379" data-attributes="member: 24956"><p>This would apply to many other rifles on the list should they be popular enough to cause companies to develope more options for them. The popularity makes the AR common, which makes them cheap, which makes them popular.</p><p></p><p> I beleive that the "frame or receiver" part of the weapon that should be considered the gun is the part that holds the barrel and bolt together and can chamber a round. You can fire an AR upper without the lower, but the upper is not considered the gun part to be transfered. The sig has the same two piece design but has the upper as the "receiver" as the main part. This registration oddity with the AR has really given it a big advantage as far as popularity. Hopefully no criminal will buy an AR upper and a little hammer and ruin it for everyone.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman, post: 1670379, member: 24956"] This would apply to many other rifles on the list should they be popular enough to cause companies to develope more options for them. The popularity makes the AR common, which makes them cheap, which makes them popular. I beleive that the "frame or receiver" part of the weapon that should be considered the gun is the part that holds the barrel and bolt together and can chamber a round. You can fire an AR upper without the lower, but the upper is not considered the gun part to be transfered. The sig has the same two piece design but has the upper as the "receiver" as the main part. This registration oddity with the AR has really given it a big advantage as far as popularity. Hopefully no criminal will buy an AR upper and a little hammer and ruin it for everyone. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Semi-Auto Battle Rifle... Which one?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom