Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Gear Talk
Sig Brace ???
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shadowrider" data-source="post: 2682972" data-attributes="member: 3099"><p>These letters are the only real hints to the public and local LEOs of what the ATF considers legal. They also state the exact opposite of your quote in that they go off of the design intent not whether the gun is "used properly". Agreed on your other points and this nonsense is just more justification for dumping SBR and SBS from NFA altogether. They are like a fish flopping out of water on this thing, using their current logic you could consider a plain pistol tube as a shoulder stock if you shoulder it and fire. <img src="/images/smilies/screwy.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":screwy:" title="Screwy :screwy:" data-shortname=":screwy:" /></p><p></p><p><a href="http://gunssavelives.net/gun-industry/breaking-atf-issues-new-opinion-letter-stating-that-shouldering-sig-brace-is-illegal/" target="_blank">See the March 5, 2014 letter to Sgt. Bradley</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shadowrider, post: 2682972, member: 3099"] These letters are the only real hints to the public and local LEOs of what the ATF considers legal. They also state the exact opposite of your quote in that they go off of the design intent not whether the gun is "used properly". Agreed on your other points and this nonsense is just more justification for dumping SBR and SBS from NFA altogether. They are like a fish flopping out of water on this thing, using their current logic you could consider a plain pistol tube as a shoulder stock if you shoulder it and fire. :screwy: [URL="http://gunssavelives.net/gun-industry/breaking-atf-issues-new-opinion-letter-stating-that-shouldering-sig-brace-is-illegal/"]See the March 5, 2014 letter to Sgt. Bradley[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Gear Talk
Sig Brace ???
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom