Will be ordering one shortly at a discounted price, difference is less than $100. The sig comes with magpul furniture, the SW with a rear sight (carry handle). All things considered, which is the better rifle/deal? I can get the FDE sig for another $50. I know there will be a considerable wait on either, which is fine.
better for what?
All-purpose right now, but duty weapon in the future. I will also use it for training courses in the meantime. Looks like the SW MOE mid will be more than the m400, less than the enhanced, and the sig prices for LEO/Instructors are posted publicly $825 on the m400, $966-$987 for the enhanced. http://www.sigsauer.com/upFiles/Cms... Price List - Master IOP rev 02-06-2013.pdf
Last edited:
If those are your only two choices then it's a coin toss. I would give a slight nod to the sig based on its 1/7 twist barrel and their reputedly good cs. Both have similar enough specs as to barrel steel and material testing to make any other comparisons a wash.
I agree.
I would base the decision on price, and how much you like the Magpul furniture.
That being said, I had a M&P OR, and was very pleased with it.
I would give the nod to the sig. The only real difference between the two is the 1/7 twist barrel on the sig over the 1/9 on the M&P.
I don't know that a factory FDE job would be worth it IMO. A cousin of mine bought a Colt with factory FDE and the finish was ****. Especially compared to some of Jarred's work at Harsh Firearms.
FWIW, I own a M&P and have been quite happy with it.
I don't know that a factory FDE job would be worth it IMO. A cousin of mine bought a Colt with factory FDE and the finish was ****. Especially compared to some of Jarred's work at Harsh Firearms.
FWIW, I own a M&P and have been quite happy with it.
Sig FTW!!
agreed. I am biased as I own two sigs.
Similar threads
