Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Sig Sauer P365
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="APH Tactical" data-source="post: 3078453" data-attributes="member: 40946"><p>Ouch Nikat! I guess i should have read this report myself prior to running my mouth instead of lazily skimming through one of the random firearms news feeds sent to my phone. Thank you for setting me straight on this one, and your're right, is a huge difference between a 75% chance of going "bang" when you pull the trigger and a 75% chance of lasting 2k rounds without hard stoppages. You gentlemen and Sig have my apologies. But... I think this is also going to show how much of a blow the reputation of Sig is taking over this, because just like playing that game "telephone" as a kid, details in the story get changed along the way. The details in positive stories get changed to promote the positive theme and details in negative stories get changed to become well... more negative.</p><p></p><p>The simplest facts though are:</p><p>1. The gun had safety issues.</p><p>2. They fixed the issue.</p><p>3. The fix decreased the reliability of the weapon system.</p><p></p><p>No matter how the story is told, these details will be there and won't be helping Sig sales. I wish they were a publicly traded company so we could see what "The Smart Money" thought of the company now as opposed to when the Army first announced they were going with the P320s, though I'm sure the release of the 365 would calm investors a bit. </p><p>But again, may God help them if the 365 falls on its face. A gun this innovative will be in thousands of homes before the first people start getting any REAL(+1500rds) trigger-time behind the platform.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="APH Tactical, post: 3078453, member: 40946"] Ouch Nikat! I guess i should have read this report myself prior to running my mouth instead of lazily skimming through one of the random firearms news feeds sent to my phone. Thank you for setting me straight on this one, and your're right, is a huge difference between a 75% chance of going "bang" when you pull the trigger and a 75% chance of lasting 2k rounds without hard stoppages. You gentlemen and Sig have my apologies. But... I think this is also going to show how much of a blow the reputation of Sig is taking over this, because just like playing that game "telephone" as a kid, details in the story get changed along the way. The details in positive stories get changed to promote the positive theme and details in negative stories get changed to become well... more negative. The simplest facts though are: 1. The gun had safety issues. 2. They fixed the issue. 3. The fix decreased the reliability of the weapon system. No matter how the story is told, these details will be there and won't be helping Sig sales. I wish they were a publicly traded company so we could see what "The Smart Money" thought of the company now as opposed to when the Army first announced they were going with the P320s, though I'm sure the release of the 365 would calm investors a bit. But again, may God help them if the 365 falls on its face. A gun this innovative will be in thousands of homes before the first people start getting any REAL(+1500rds) trigger-time behind the platform. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Sig Sauer P365
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom