Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Stand Your Ground law coming under scrutiny due to the Zimmerman/Florida incident
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stephen Cue" data-source="post: 1772107" data-attributes="member: 3008"><p>RE: SYG laws under scrutiny...</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0416/Bill-Cosby-says-Trayvon-Martin-case-is-about-gun-ownership-not-race" target="_blank">http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0416/Bill-Cosby-says-Trayvon-Martin-case-is-about-gun-ownership-not-race</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where are the stats that show how many victims suffered severe bodily harm/death due to being legally obligation to retreat before being able to defend themselves AFTER an attack?</p><p></p><p>Due to the fact that law-abiding citizens are able to DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST LEATHAL FORCE WITH LEATHAL FORCE against scumbags when they attack, seems the media can longer distinguish between criminals that were justifiably shot and victims that were shot from unprovoked attacks.</p><p></p><p>Forget about the mere little fact that most of these so called "justifiable homicides" would not ever happened if there was not evidence to show a law-abiding citizen was attacked and assaulted. </p><p></p><p>Cases like Zimmerman/Martin are obviously the exception, not the rule; due to the lack of clear cut evidence. In which, no matter how I personally feel about Zimmerman's "guilt" or not. Lack of convincing evidence should rightly set a defendant free.</p><p></p><p>We need to educate as many of our friends and aquiantances as we can about what justifiable uses of force means.</p><p></p><p>ONLY a threat of severe bodily harm or death to us, our family, someone we have a relationship with, or to stop a clear forcible felony are justified uses of deadly force. Anything short of these will not only muddy are cause, but will mitigate the future nuturing of gun ownership.</p><p></p><p>START THE PROSELYTIZING NOW!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stephen Cue, post: 1772107, member: 3008"] RE: SYG laws under scrutiny... [URL="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0416/Bill-Cosby-says-Trayvon-Martin-case-is-about-gun-ownership-not-race"]http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0416/Bill-Cosby-says-Trayvon-Martin-case-is-about-gun-ownership-not-race[/URL] Where are the stats that show how many victims suffered severe bodily harm/death due to being legally obligation to retreat before being able to defend themselves AFTER an attack? Due to the fact that law-abiding citizens are able to DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST LEATHAL FORCE WITH LEATHAL FORCE against scumbags when they attack, seems the media can longer distinguish between criminals that were justifiably shot and victims that were shot from unprovoked attacks. Forget about the mere little fact that most of these so called "justifiable homicides" would not ever happened if there was not evidence to show a law-abiding citizen was attacked and assaulted. Cases like Zimmerman/Martin are obviously the exception, not the rule; due to the lack of clear cut evidence. In which, no matter how I personally feel about Zimmerman's "guilt" or not. Lack of convincing evidence should rightly set a defendant free. We need to educate as many of our friends and aquiantances as we can about what justifiable uses of force means. ONLY a threat of severe bodily harm or death to us, our family, someone we have a relationship with, or to stop a clear forcible felony are justified uses of deadly force. Anything short of these will not only muddy are cause, but will mitigate the future nuturing of gun ownership. START THE PROSELYTIZING NOW! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Stand Your Ground law coming under scrutiny due to the Zimmerman/Florida incident
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom