Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court backs Hobby Lobby
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FullAuto" data-source="post: 2560119" data-attributes="member: 5110"><p>Benefits of any kind shouldn't be required. They were originally offered to one up their competition and get the better employees. Now people think they're a right. If a company wants to give less benefits or none at all, they should be allowed to. If the employees don't like it, they'll go elsewhere and the business will fail. If the business wants to stay in business, they'll make the necessary adjustments. Maybe they want to offer lower benefits and get the bottom of the barrel employees. My company gives great benefits including 401k matching and a separate pension system. It has cost them money their competitors don't spend but in return, the better employees from the competition all attempt to come here. They get loyalty and have grown to over double the size of their nearest competition. Private business is smarter than gov't will ever be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FullAuto, post: 2560119, member: 5110"] Benefits of any kind shouldn't be required. They were originally offered to one up their competition and get the better employees. Now people think they're a right. If a company wants to give less benefits or none at all, they should be allowed to. If the employees don't like it, they'll go elsewhere and the business will fail. If the business wants to stay in business, they'll make the necessary adjustments. Maybe they want to offer lower benefits and get the bottom of the barrel employees. My company gives great benefits including 401k matching and a separate pension system. It has cost them money their competitors don't spend but in return, the better employees from the competition all attempt to come here. They get loyalty and have grown to over double the size of their nearest competition. Private business is smarter than gov't will ever be. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court backs Hobby Lobby
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom