Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
The .45 G.A.P.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="liliysdad" data-source="post: 1264408" data-attributes="member: 51"><p>As will the 40 or 9. The major handgun calibers are basically equivalent in effectiveness, and because of this, there really is no verifiable need for new calibers. </p><p></p><p>Had it not been for a few major contracts, the 357 Sig would have suffered the same fate as the GAP, and rightfully so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="liliysdad, post: 1264408, member: 51"] As will the 40 or 9. The major handgun calibers are basically equivalent in effectiveness, and because of this, there really is no verifiable need for new calibers. Had it not been for a few major contracts, the 357 Sig would have suffered the same fate as the GAP, and rightfully so. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
The .45 G.A.P.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom