This administration's Green policies and how they affect Oil/Nat-Gas/Coal...

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ez bake

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,535
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa Area
So I keep hearing these arguments on how Obama (and the Dems') Green policies have totally crippled our nation's energy industry (so much that it is used in arguments to point out how Obama is responsible for the economy to some degree) and yet oil has made some record profits during Obama's 1st term with no signs of losing money any time soon.

The answer I seem to get is a complete ignoring of that fact while we move onto Coal (presumably because coal isn't making record profits).

So let me ask this:

What are the specific policies of Obama's administration (or even Dems in Congress or agencies like the EPA) that affect the Coal industry?

How much of an effect have these policies truly had in terms of real numbers - how much production/exporting, how much profit, how many jobs lost?





I'm genuinely interested and have learned a thing or two from the Union and Welfare threads that I honestly didn't know before.

Please use sources or use real numbers that can be found somewhere.

Here's some basic stuff from Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal#Major_coal_producers
 

ez bake

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,535
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa Area
LOL you ask for sources and real numbers yet quote wikipedia?

You understand why the old-ways of mistrusting Wikipedia are as stupid as mis-trusting Snopes when all of Wikipedia's sources are listed at the bottom of the page right? Also, it's Internet-regulated so anyone who makes a mis-statement can be corrected by millions of people all with access to the same source information.

Hell Fox News' website doesn't always do that for you (neither does MSNBC). I'll go on record as saying that I trust Wikipedia way more than I do either Fox or MSNBC.
 

ignerntbend

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
15,797
Reaction score
3,270
Location
Oklahoma
Wikipedia is as acurate as any encyclopedia. It isn't the absolute truth brought down from the mountain by Moses.
Nothing is. The fact that it's being constantly edited is a positive in my book. [My own book is being constantly edited]
 

Lurker66

Sharpshooter
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
9,332
Reaction score
8
Location
Pink
I think the coal industry is feeling threatened by other energy sources.

What i find ironic is in spite of Obama, EPA and the green movement, we're producing more oil and importing way less than ever before.

I think this has affected the coal industry more than anything, not government policies.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
3,071
Location
East of Tulsa
If the government would back off and let the free market run, we would have the least expensive energy on the planet. America has always been innovative enough to develop ways of doing thing, and private businesses who offer the best, least expensive products come to the forefront without government intervention. We have about 200 years of oil in the ground in America today but not a new refinery in 40 years to use it. Why do we absolutely have to have an alternative solution nailed down by 2020 or we will all be taxed out of existence?
 

ez bake

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,535
Reaction score
0
Location
Tulsa Area
If the government would back off and let the free market run, we would have the least expensive energy on the planet. America has always been innovative enough to develop ways of doing thing, and private businesses who offer the best, least expensive products come to the forefront without government intervention. We have about 200 years of oil in the ground in America today but not a new refinery in 40 years to use it. Why do we absolutely have to have an alternative solution nailed down by 2020 or we will all be taxed out of existence?

The concept of the free market has been thrown out years ago by the government's actions in tipping the scales towards large public-held corporations and against small private-owned companies (via regulations, corporate welfare, subsidizations, tax-loopholes, etc.). I'm a fan of free-market too, but none of this has anything to do with what the government has done to hurt the Coal or Oil industries.
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
33,267
Reaction score
46,863
Location
Tulsa

inactive

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,158
Reaction score
903
Location
I.T.
If the government would back off and let the free market run, we would have the least expensive energy on the planet.

At what point does energy cease becoming a smaller local (meaning, regional or national) market and begin to become a larger global one? I think we may already be part way to that point.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom