This side-effect of the gay marriage ruling will make liberals EXPLODE

[AKJ20]

YEEhaw! This side-effect of the gay marriage ruling will make liberals EXPLODE

Using the same “due process clause” argument as the Supreme Court just applied to gay marriage, my concealed carry permit must now be recognized as valid in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.“

http://allenbwest.com/2015/06/yeehaw-this-side-effect-of-the-gay-marriage-ruling-will-make-liberals-explode/

 

[mugsy]

The logic is reasonable, but since the courts have been able to torture in rights that are enumerated nowhere and ignore rights that are clearly listed, I am not hopeful.

 

[chuter]

^^^this

It's no longer about what the law says, it's more about what the court thinks congress really meant when they passed the law.

We've had some victories for the 2nd amendment; Heller being the big one, but the country is on a march to the left, and I fear 2nd amendment rights will be the next big thing to go.

 

[FullAuto]

How about certain states being forced to recognize, accept and allow legal machinegun ownership recognized by the federal gov't and the majority of other states?

 

[Fredkrueger100]

Would be nice but when our country is ran by the idiots that it is and the Supreme Court morons it will never happen. But I can guarantee that the 2A being whiped out will eventually happen.

 

[druryj]

I heard this somewhere, so I can't take credit for it; "The big winners here will be the divorce lawyers". Mo marriages, mo divorces, mo money!

 

[abajaj11]

Would be nice but when our country is ran by the idiots that it is and the Supreme Court morons it will never happen. But I can guarantee that the 2A being whiped out will eventually happen.

I think as long as pro RKBAers stick together and patronize organizations like the NRA and GOA, we will be OK.
The important thing is to avoid a nay-saying attitude that will discourage 2Aers.
I also think that anti RKBAers will infiltrate forums like this , pretending to be pro RKBA, but spread discouragement and a sense that "our 2A rights WILL go, the question is only by how much"...
I don't see any reason why any of our rights have to go, as long as we refuse to compromise. We already have far too many losses to a God given right, protected explicitly in our Constitution.
The heller ruling was quite definite and I seriously doubt this Supreme court will go against it.
For all gun owners who voted for current POTUS, remember, elections have consequences. Keep that in mind for the future.
For everyone out there, i'd recommend..JOIN the NRA and gift a couple of memberships to young people as well..
Join the GOA and gift a membership there as well..
Call up your rep and senator regularly.

No reason why 2A should slip.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

We only loose those things we don't take a stand to keep. Know what the soap boxes and ballot boxes are made out of? Empty cartridge boxes.

Woody

 

[Dave70968]

Won't work, guys; the Full Faith and Credit has never been construed as to force State X to apply State Y's statutes of conduct within its own borders; in fact, it's been held that such is emphatically not the case:

In Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, a Nevada citizen filed suit against the Franchise Tax Board of California ("CFTB") in a Nevada state court, seeking compensatory and punitive damages against CFTB for allegedly tortious acts committed in the course of an attempted tax collection. CFTB contended, among other things, that the Nevada courts were obligated to give full faith and credit to the statutory immunity that California had conferred on its public employees and public agencies for both negligent and intentional torts. The Nevada Supreme Court granted immunity to CFTB for negligence as a matter of "comity," but refused to grant immunity for intentional torts.

The Supreme Court affirmed, refusing to create a "new rule" requiring that a state court extend full faith and credit to another state's statutorily conferred immunity when a refusal to do so would interfere with a state's capacity to fulfill its own sovereign responsibilities.

Read the whole thing; it's quite good: https://dspace.creighton.edu/xmlui/..._38CreightonLRev465(2004-2005).pdf?sequence=1

Incidentally, Full Faith and Credit has not one thing to do with why your driver's license is honored by other states; that comes from the Driver License Agreement. Full Faith and Credit basically means that if I sue you and win in Oklahoma, I can enforce that judgment against you in California.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Don't be too quick to jump on the band wagon.

Beware of the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling. It has a nasty pig in its poke. In that ruling, the Court claimed that the Constitution granted a right(Pg. 28). If the Court gets away with this, it can be claimed that the RKBA is granted by the Constitution and then all it would take to eliminate the right would be to eliminate the Second Amendment.

As it stands right now, the Second Amendment protects the right. If the Second Amendment goes away, we still would have the right regardless of whether it is protected in the Constitution or not. (Note: The Ninth Amendment would still indirectly protect the right.)

Repeating for effect, if it becomes accepted that the right is granted by the Constitution, the right itself can be considered non-existent in the eyes of the law if the Second Amendment is repealed.

I hope more people than me have seen this little precedent-setting usurpation. I can't believe this is a synesis or a trope. I believe it is on purpose.

Woody